Re: [PATCH] CIFS: remove local xattr definitions

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:48:27 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Steve French wrote:
> 
> > makes sense - do we want this going through the cifs tree or as part
> > of the xattr change mentioned below.
> 
> Should be fine to go into the CIFS tree, as long as that is in -next.

Except then that could leave Linus' tree broken during the next merge
window depending on the order he merges the cifs and security-testing
trees.  Unless that patch is sent to Linus as a fix patch before the next
merge window, of course.

I will add this patch as a merge fixup to the merge of the
security-testing tree for today.  And will remove my copy when one of the
trees gets fixed.

James: maybe I should change the name of your tree in -next to just
"security"?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature