Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:45 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Code is
> 
>         unsigned long freerun = (thresh + bg_thresh) / 2;
> 
>         setpoint = (limit + freerun) / 2;
>         pos_ratio = abs(dirty - setpoint);
>         pos_ratio <<= BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
>         do_div(pos_ratio, limit - setpoint + 1);

Why do you use do_div()? from the code those things are unsigned long,
and you can divide that just fine.

Also, there's div64_s64 that can do signed divides for s64 types.
That'll loose the extra conditionals you used for abs and putting the
sign back.

>         x = pos_ratio;
>         pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
>         pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;

So on 32bit with unsigned long that gets 32=2*(10+b) bits for x, that
solves to 6, which isn't going to be enough I figure since
(dirty-setpoint) !< 64.

So you really need to use u64/s64 types here, unsigned long just won't
do, with u64 you have 64=2(10+b) 22 bits for x, which should fit.


>         if (dirty > setpoint)
>                 pos_ratio = -pos_ratio;
>         pos_ratio += 1 << BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT; 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/