Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Aug 15 2011 - 16:47:47 EST

On 08/15/2011 01:23 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:27:53 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 08/15/2011 10:39 AM, Mike Waychison wrote:
>>>> I would like to see the <id@owner> format I mentioned.
>>> Is there a middle ground if we say:
>>> Internal-reference-ID: <arbitrarytextforid@owner>
>>> so
>>> Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>
>>> Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@google>
>> Personally I don't care if they are separate lines or all on the same line.
> I don't understand how that answers Mike's question...
Then I don't understand the question.

I proposed:

Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap> <33999@google>

Mike proposed:

Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>
Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@google>

The only difference I see is if they are on the same line, which I don't
personally care about.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at