Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re:[RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Egads.  Does this mean that doing GETREGS and then doing SETREGS later
> on with the *exact same values* is considered incorrect?

No. If it does it with exactly the same values, it's perfectly ok. But
it isn't. It's changing some of those values.

>  IMO, this way lies madness.

No, the madness is in UML.

It's EMULATING A SYSTEM CALL. That original "getregs" value is not
some "user space state". It's the *system call* state that you got
after the system call trapped. Setting it back is an insane operation,
but it would happen to work - if you make no changes.

But UML *does* make changes. It takes that system call state, and then
EMULATES THE SYSTEM CALL INCORRECTLY.

If you see it that way (which is the correct way), then it's clearly
an UML problem, and it's not at all "madness" that your
getregs/setregs pairing doesn't work.

See? Buggy system call emulation. It's really that simple. Of course,
"simple" in this case is "really really subtle differences in how the
kernel treats syscall/sysenter/int80", so the *details* are certainly
not simple, but the concept is.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/