Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not really. UART2_CTS can't be routed to arbitrary pads, but it can be
> routed to more than one pad:
>
> #define _MX51_PAD_EIM_D16__UART2_CTS            IOMUX_PAD(0x3f0, 0x5c, 3, 0x0000, 0, 0)
> #define _MX51_PAD_EIM_D25__UART2_CTS            IOMUX_PAD(0x414, 0x80, 4, 0x0000, 0, 0)
> #define _MX51_PAD_USBH1_DATA0__UART2_CTS        IOMUX_PAD(0x688, 0x288, 1, 0x0000, 0, 0)

Aha!

Is it typically a few pads like this, say 2,3,4 alternatives,
sometimes just one?

So the actual relation is not 1..1 nor 1...* but 1..<a few>?

> This is why there can't be a setup_iomux(uart2) function without
> being able to specify *which* pads in a board specific way.

In the current design it is the pinmux driver that
keeps track of that. Not the subsystem.

I think the question then is how the pinctrl subsystem
can help out in keeping that information together.

I'll try to think of something ...

Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/