Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86: add cmpxchg_flag() variant

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

> But the interface hides the implementation specifics, so its not all
> that important.

Ok but could you make it consistent throughout? The cmpxchg_double's do
not have the _flags at the end but also already do a sete. So either
rename those or come up with another convention?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/