Re: [PATCH 1/5] TTY: serial, use ASYNCB_CLOSING in uart_close

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 25 August 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> 
> We need to move port->mutex locking after wait_until_sent in
> uart_close (for rationale see next patches). But if we did it now, we
> would introduce a race between close and open. This is exactly why
> port->mutex is locked at the top of uart_close.
> 
> To avoid the race, we add ASYNCB_CLOSING to uart_close. Like every
> other sane TTY driver. Thanks to tty_port_block_til_ready used in
> uart_open we will have this for free. Then we can move the port->mutex
> lock.
> 
> Also note that this will make the conversion to tty_port helpers
> easier. They are currently handling ASYNC_CLOSING flag correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>

The series looks good to me,

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

The only thing left to note is probably that there are a bunch
of drivers that implement their own *_wait_until_sent function
and call that from their *_close function instead of calling
tty_wait_until_sent. These drivers continue to suffer from the
same stalls that you are fixing the other ones.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/