Re: [PATCH] staging: brcmfmac: Consolidate debugging macros

From: Arend van Spriel
Date: Fri Aug 26 2011 - 05:24:30 EST


On 08/26/2011 11:19 AM, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
W dniu 26 sierpnia 2011 11:02 uÅytkownik Joe Perches<joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ:
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 10:55 +0200, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
2011/8/25 Joe Perches<joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Convert multiple BRCMF_<debug_level> macros to a single
brcmf_dbg(level, fmt, ...) macro.
I'm not sure if that "_dbg" suffix is a really good choice. You use
"_dbg" for all the kinds of messages, while "DEBUG" is already one
kind of messages.
No, not really. These _are_ debugging uses.

The #include is called dhd_dbg.h and
the whole block is guarded by

#if defined(BCMDBG)

We have also other types like EMERG, ALERT, CRIT,
ERR, WARNING, NOTICE, INFO and DEBUG.
Except for the last, those aren't debugging uses,
these are.
It makes sense, maybe some messages should be just always printed. It
seems some of they may be important for common-user having problem
with his card. Just few random ones:
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "device attach failed\n");
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "Failed to enable F1 Err: 0x%08x\n", err_ret);
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "MACEVENT: %s [unsupported version --> brcmf
version:%d dongle version:%d]\n",
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "mismatched OUI, bailing\n");
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "brcmf_net_attach failed, err %d\n",
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "failed to bring up cfg80211\n");
brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "HT Avail request error: %d\n", err);

Hi RafaÅ,

The feedback from Greg was that no user would be interested in it so we cleaned it up and put it under Kconfig option.

Gr. AvS

--
Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane.
-- H.P. Lovecraft --


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/