Re: m68k: Convert to genirq (WIP)

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:53, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> via1_irq
>> Â Â OSS_IRQLEV_VIA1 = IRQ_AUTO_6 (on oss) Â Â Â conflict: psc_irq
>>
>> Â Â IRQ_AUTO_1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âconflict: iop_ism_irq

>> iop_ism_irq
>> Â Â OSS_IRQLEV_IOPISM = 1 = IRQ_AUTO_1 (on oss) conflict: via1_irq
>
> via1_irq is remapped to IRQ_AUTO_6 on OSS.

According to via_register_interrupts(), it requests both:

        if (via_alt_mapping) {
                if (request_irq(IRQ_AUTO_1, via1_irq, 0, "software",
                                (void *)via1))
                        pr_err("Couldn't register %s interrupt\n", "software");
                if (request_irq(IRQ_AUTO_6, via1_irq, 0, "via1", (void *)via1))
                        pr_err("Couldn't register %s interrupt\n", "via1");
        } else {
                if (request_irq(IRQ_AUTO_1, via1_irq, 0, "via1", (void *)via1))
                        pr_err("Couldn't register %s interrupt\n", "via1");
        }

Hence IRQ_AUTO_1 must be shared, and we cannot use an optimized chain
handler for via1_irq() nor iop_ism_irq(). This is the only remaining conflict
I see.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/