Re: [PATCH][Trivial] CIFS: Don't free volume_info->UNC until we areentirely done with it.

[Jeff Layton]

On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:58:34 +0200 (CEST)
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In cleanup_volume_info_contents() we kfree(volume_info->UNC); and then 
> proceed to use that variable on the very next line.
> This causes (at least) Coverity Prevent to complain about use-after-free 
> of that variable (and I guess other checkers may do that as well).
> There's not any /real/ problem here since we are just using the value of 
> the pointer, not actually dereferencing it, but it's still trivial to 
> silence the tool, so why not?
> To me at least it also just seems nicer to defer freeing the variable 
> until we are entirely done with it in all respects.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 633c246..9bb4b10 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -2877,9 +2877,9 @@ cleanup_volume_info_contents(struct smb_vol *volume_info)
>  {
>  	kfree(volume_info->username);
>  	kzfree(volume_info->password);
> -	kfree(volume_info->UNC);
>  	if (volume_info->UNCip != volume_info->UNC + 2)
>  		kfree(volume_info->UNCip);
> +	kfree(volume_info->UNC);
>  	kfree(volume_info->domainname);
>  	kfree(volume_info->iocharset);
>  	kfree(volume_info->prepath);

Seems reasonable for silencing the checker...

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/