Re: Broken pci_block_user_cfg_access interface

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2011-08-29 17:42, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I still don't get what prevents converting ipr to allow plain mutex
> synchronization. My vision is:
>  - push reset-on-error of ipr into workqueue (or threaded IRQ?)

I'm starting to like your proposal: I had a look at ipr, but it turned
out to be anything but trivial to convert that driver. It runs its
complete state machine under spin_lock_irq, and the functions calling
pci_block/unblock_user_cfg_access are deep inside this thing. I have no
hardware to test whatever change, and I feel a bit uncomfortable asking
Brian to redesign his driver that massively.

So back to your idea: I would generalize pci_block_user_cfg_access to
pci_block_cfg_access. It should fail when some other site already holds
the access lock, but it should remain non-blocking - for the sake of ipr.

We should still provide generic pci-2.3 IRQ masking services, but that
could be done in a second step. I could have a look at this.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/