Re: [PATCH v2] kconfig: handle SIGINT in menuconfig

[Arnaud Lacombe]

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> I recently got bitten in the ass when pressing Ctrl-C and lost all my current configuration changes. This patch captures SIGINT and allows the user to save any changes.
>> Some code refactoring was made in order to handle the exit behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  scripts/kconfig/mconf.c |   86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/mconf.c b/scripts/kconfig/mconf.c
>> index 820d2b6..19e200d 100644
>> --- a/scripts/kconfig/mconf.c
>> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/mconf.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>  #include <stdarg.h>
>>  #include <stdlib.h>
>>  #include <string.h>
>> +#include <signal.h>
>>  #include <unistd.h>
>>  #include <locale.h>
>>
>> @@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ static struct menu *current_menu;
>>  static int child_count;
>>  static int single_menu_mode;
>>  static int show_all_options;
>> +static int saved_x, saved_y;
>>
>>  static void conf(struct menu *menu);
>>  static void conf_choice(struct menu *menu);
>> @@ -792,9 +794,54 @@ static void conf_save(void)
>>        }
>>  }
>>
>> +static int handle_exit(void)
>> +{
>> +       int res;
>> +
>> +       dialog_clear();
>> +       if (conf_get_changed())
>> +               res = dialog_yesno(NULL,
>> +                                  _("Do you wish to save your new configuration ?\n"
>> +                                    "<ESC><ESC> to continue."),
>> +                                  6, 60);
>> +       else
>> +               res = -1;
>> +
>> +       end_dialog(saved_x, saved_y);
>> +
>> +       switch (res) {
>> +       case 0:
>> +               if (conf_write(filename)) {
>> +                       fprintf(stderr, _("\n\n"
>> +                                         "Error while writing of the configuration.\n"
>> +                                         "Your configuration changes were NOT saved."
>> +                                         "\n\n"));
>> +                       return 1;
>> +               }
>> +               /* fall through */
>> +       case -1:
>> +               printf(_("\n\n"
>> +                        "*** End of the configuration.\n"
>> +                        "*** Execute 'make' to start the build or try 'make help'."
>> +                        "\n\n"));
>> +               res = 0;
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               fprintf(stderr, _("\n\n"
>> +                                 "Your configuration changes were NOT saved."
>> +                                 "\n\n"));
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sig_handler(int signo)
>> +{
>> +       exit(handle_exit());
>> +}
>> +
> Actually, no matter what handle_exit() returns, the process will
> return error code 130 and make will abort. I'd suggest to get rid of
> the call to exit(), and only keep handle_exit().
>
> any objection ?
>
stupid me... we need the call to exit(2), but its argument do not seem
to be used.

 - Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/