[PATCH 09/15] lru_cache.h: fix comments referring to ts_ instead of lc_

[Philipp Reisner]

From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>

For some time we contemplated calling the "struct lru_cache"
a "struct tracked_set", and some comments kept the ts_ prefix.

Fix those to match the member field names.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib/lru_cache.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/lru_cache.c b/lib/lru_cache.c
index 9f353f7..4f638b8 100644
--- a/lib/lru_cache.c
+++ b/lib/lru_cache.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct lc_element *lc_get(struct lru_cache *lc, unsigned int enr)
 	/* it was not present in the active set.
 	 * we are going to recycle an unused (or even "free") element.
 	 * user may need to commit a transaction to record that change.
-	 * we serialize on flags & TF_DIRTY */
+	 * we serialize on flags & LC_DIRTY */
 	if (test_and_set_bit(__LC_DIRTY, &lc->flags)) {
 		++lc->dirty;
 		RETURN(NULL);
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/