Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] r8169: support new chips of RTL8111F

[Francois Romieu]

Hayes Wang <hayeswang@xxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index 68f1e2f..c04fbc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
[...]
> @@ -4476,6 +4602,49 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8168e_2(void __iomem *ioaddr, struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	RTL_W8(Config5, RTL_R8(Config5) & ~Spi_en);
>  }
>  
> +static void rtl_hw_start_8168f_1(void __iomem *ioaddr, struct pci_dev *pdev)
[...]
> +	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, 0x27);

Hmmm...

$ grep MaxTxPacketSize drivers/net/r8169.c
	MaxTxPacketSize	= 0xec,	/* 8101/8168. Unit of 128 bytes. */
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, 0x27);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);
	RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax);

Is the 0x27 value still in units of 128 bytes ?

Could it be TxPacketMax as everywhere else in the driver instead of 0x27 ?

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/