RE: [PATCH 0/5] Yet another pass at machine check recovery

[Luck, Tony]

> Two slightly different versions showed up here almost on top of each other.
> Which one should we be looking at? Or do you want us to ignore both and you do
> another one with REPOST in the subject?

My script that added "in-reply-to" parts 1-5 to make them thread
from part 0 got a little over-enthusiastic and started recursing
on its own output.

The second version is identical (patchwise) to the first - it just
has a bogus "From: "Luck, Tony" line added.

I don't think I need to clutter the list with a repost.

Sorry for the noise and confusion - the bad script has been
told to go sit in the corner with a paper bag on its head.

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/