Re: [PATCH 01/24] fix default __strnlen_user macro

[Mark Salter]

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:54 +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> It should either be changed as I suggested, or the comment in uaccess.h 
> should be updated to reflect the actual behaviour of the function 
> (stating that it returns n + 1 in the case where n is reached). Either 
> way, its probably worth doing a quick check through the arch specific 
> versions to see what their behaviour really is. It looks like there are 
> potentially some subtle bugs at the callsites.

I think commenting it in uaccess.h is the only sane way to go. Changing
the semantics means changing all the arch-specific versions, most of
which are asm code and changing most, if not all callsites. All of the
arch-specific versions I looked at include the NULL count.

--Mark



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/