Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control
From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Sat Sep 17 2011 - 14:34:11 EST
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:11:32PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:46:12PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > +int tcp_init_cgroup_fill(struct proto *prot, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > + struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
> > +{
> > + prot->enter_memory_pressure = tcp_enter_memory_pressure;
> > + prot->memory_allocated = memory_allocated_tcp;
> > + prot->prot_mem = tcp_sysctl_mem;
> > + prot->sockets_allocated = sockets_allocated_tcp;
> > + prot->memory_pressure = memory_pressure_tcp;
>
> No fancy formatting, please.
>
What's wrong with having fancy formatting? It's indeed easier to read
when members are assigned this way. It's always up to maintainer to
choose what he prefers, but I see nothing wrong in such style (if only it
doesn't break the style of the whole file).
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/