Re: [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields in cpuacct

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:04 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +       CPUACCT_STAT_IRQ,       /* ... irq ticks */
> +       CPUACCT_STAT_SOFTIRQ,   /* ... softirq ticks */

Would it make sense to make the cpustat thing an array as well? That way
the if forest will compute an array index and the cgroup and cpustat
parts can then use the 'same' code.

That avoids having to pass a cputime64_t* and int around for pretty much
the same thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/