Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings

[Segher Boessenkool]

> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.

"interrupt-parent" is defined in the Open Firmware "interrupt mapping"
recommended practice, the same place as "interrupt-map" etc. are.

> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to  
> handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.

"interrupt-parent" is only meant to be used for the simple cases.  It's
quite handy there.  It is also required in all "interrupt-controller"
nodes that aren't the root of the interrupt tree.


Segher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/