On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21:58AM +0800, Chen Gong wrote:If you insist on your design, I prefer deleting the function pstore_write before applying your patch. We all know no real users to call this function,ä 2011/9/21 20:40, Matthew Garrett åé:On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:31:40AM +0800, Chen Gong wrote:mutex_lock(&psinfo->buf_mutex);
memcpy(psinfo->buf, buf, size);
- id = psinfo->write(type, 0, size, psinfo);
+ id = psinfo->write(type, 0, KMSG_DUMP_UNKNOWN, size, psinfo);
I can't say it is wrong because no real caller for this function, but I can't
say it is right, yet. KMSG_DUMP_UNKNOWN here looks too arbirary. Do you have
any reason to use this type here ?
If a function calls pstore_write() directly then we have no type to
associate with it. It seems worth making this explicit.
Yep, that's the point. We hope to get a more reasonable method to do it, not
any assumption.
I'm afraid I don't understand. Could you give an example of how you
think this should look?