Re: [PATCH RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficientto call early

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

On 09/30/2011 09:34 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Doesn't interrupts need to be disabled here too? As stop machine
> functions also guarantee that they will not be interrupted by
> interrupts. -- Steve

Good point.

    J

Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before SMP has been
set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if there's
only one CPU online.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index ba5070c..a45b36d 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -485,6 +485,17 @@ int __stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data, const struct cpumask *cpus)
 					    .num_threads = num_online_cpus(),
 					    .active_cpus = cpus };
 
+	if (smdata.num_threads == 1) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+		int ret;
+
+		local_save_flags(flags);
+		ret = (*fn)(data);
+		local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	/* Set the initial state and stop all online cpus. */
 	set_state(&smdata, STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
 	return stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask, stop_machine_cpu_stop, &smdata);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/