Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
From: Rajiv Andrade
Date: Mon Oct 10 2011 - 12:23:31 EST
On 09/10/11 23:29, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 10/09/2011 04:51 PM, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Another week, another -rc.
suspend to ram regression is annoying (still visible on rc9;
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/24/76) but unfortunately maintainers are
silent.
I tried -rc9 on my Lenovo W500 with that same TPM. I cannot reproduce
the 'scheduling while atomic' problem you had reported earlier. I also
could suspend / resume fine as long as I did the following:
- suspended with the tpm_tis driver as module in the kernel
- once a suspend was done without the tpm_tis driver the subsequent
suspends were all done without the tpm_tis driver
Once I had done a suspend/resume with the tpm_tis driver *not* in the
kernel and then again a suspend with the tpm_tis driver in the kernel,
it did not resume anymore. I believe previously (previous version of
kernel and/or Fedora) it refused to even suspend. The reason why this
doesn't work properly is that the driver has to send a command to the
TPM upon suspend and the BIOS then sends the corresponding wakeup
command.
Did you maybe previously suspend/resume without a tpm_tis driver and
then try to suspend with it ?
Also, my Lenovo W500 shows particularly odd behavior when I switch
from Windows to Linux. The first suspend with a Linux booted after
Windows (with or without tpm_tis driver) does *not* resume (reboot
required). A subsequently rebooted Linux makes the suspend/resume work
fine.
Stefan
Arkadiusz,
Do you still see the issue with this patch [1][2] applied?
[1] - http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131824905826280&w=2
[2] - github.com/srajiv/tpm.git for-james
Thanks,
Rajiv
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/