Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address isinvalid

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:58:09PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:

> Maybe the extra indirection isn't that bad and no one will care? If so,
> then sure, a unified version sounds like a plan. I was just hesitant of
> changing the existing 64-bit implementation for fear of receiving
> replies like "you've now made the 64-bit path slower".

If we have UEFI calls on the fast path then I think we're already 
losing. I'd favour simplicity over performance here, personally.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/