Re: [PATCHv5] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

[Vinod Koul]

On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:29 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> 
> > Nevertheless, cyclic should be supported for all dmaengine APIs (but not
> > adding new APIs for cyclic) and in consistent manner by having a generic
> > cyclic flag and caps.
> >
> You are already merging Cyclic into Slave_sg. And Slave_sg could be
> merged into this api. So overall we would get rid one parameter passed
> outside of the parameter structure - dmaxfer_template. (Yes I want to
> reduce dependence on 'flags' argument as much as possible). 
The flags parameter already exists and we are not using it properly in
slave cases.

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/