Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Mon Oct 24 2011 - 07:06:26 EST
On 10/24/2011 04:50 AM, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:34 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
> > for further code clean up.
> > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
> > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
> Would you like to give some comments of this?
Sorry, was travelling:
Acked-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/