Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extractregulator_init_data
From: Grant Likely
Date: Mon Oct 24 2011 - 07:35:53 EST
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:11:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:26:49PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > On Monday 24 October 2011 02:32 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >Okay, it's wrong then since so many people say it's wrong :) I guess
> > >a quick fix would be adding one property in device tree node for
> > >matching some unique field in regulator_desc, id, maybe? Mark, any
> > >suggestion?
> >
> > Thats basically what the DT compatible property is for :)
>
> But adding compatible property will get DT core create 'struct dev'
> for each regulator node, while we are trying to avoid that since
> regulator core has been doing this.
By design, of_platform_populate() will only go one level deep except
if it matches the passed in list of bus compatible properties. Having
a compatible property does not necessarily create a struct dev.
That said, I agree with you that a compatible property isn't really
needed in the child nodes **if it is defined as part of the parent
node's binding**.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/