Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / Sleep: Extended control of suspend/hibernate interfaces

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:52:44 +1100, NeilBrown said:
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:23:43 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, October 24, 2011, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:16:36 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Similarly every system need one process to manage suspend.  It can be my
> > > > daemon or your daemon or Alan's daemon but it cannot be 2 or more of them
> > > > running at the same time as that doesn't make any more sense than having
> > > > systemd and init running at the same time.
> > >
> > > I agree that it doesn't makes sense.  I don't agree that it implies people
> > > won't try to do that.
> >
> > Does that matter?  If they complain, tell them it isn't a supported
> > configuration.
> 
> We however *should* design things in such a way that if a second one is started
> up, it tosses a nice obvious -EIDIOT error of some sort.

Well, that's exactly my point.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/