Re: Linux 3.1-rc9

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, David Miller wrote:

> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:13:48 +0200
> 
> > Added netdev, because this seems to be a generic networking bug (ABBA
> > between sk_lock and icsk_retransmit_timer if my quick scan looks
> > correct).
> > 
> > Davem?
> 
> I suspect that's all just a side effect of whatever is creating the
> preempt_count imbalance.

Something is holding socket lock and it was acquired in sk_clone()
which does bh_lock_sock() and returns with the lock held, though I got
completely lost in the gazillions of possible callchains ...

While staring at it I found an missing unlock in sk_clone() itself,
but that's not the one which causes the leak. Lockdep would have
complained about that separately :)

Thanks,

	tglx

--------->
Subject: net: Unlock sock before calling sk_free()

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/net/core/sock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/core/sock.c
+++ linux-2.6/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1260,6 +1260,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock 
 			/* It is still raw copy of parent, so invalidate
 			 * destructor and make plain sk_free() */
 			newsk->sk_destruct = NULL;
+			bh_unlock_sock(newsk);
 			sk_free(newsk);
 			newsk = NULL;
 			goto out;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/