Re: [PATCH staging 6/6] et131x: uncloak PCIe capabilities.

[Mark Einon]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 05:59:21PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx> :
> [...]
> > The PCIe changes are good, however I think using gotos here doesn't add
> > anything as there's no difficult locking to navigate and makes the code
> > harder to read.
> > both out: and err_out: are used to return an error, and the backwards
> > jumping goto makes me a bit uncomfortable. Could you respin with just the
> > PCIe changes?
> 
> I confess I use a 55 lines vi split terminal when reviewing these blocks.
> 
> As there is no documentation to check the remaining PCIe candidate bits,
> it's probably not worth it anyway.

Ok, I'll fixup the changes I highlighted and Ack your original patches, it's not much work to do so.

I do have some documentation for the PCI part of the registers (et1310_datasheet.pdf), which you can find online or I can send you a copy if you're interested (I managed to get it from LSI, who bought Agere).
I've also been using a datasheet for the truephy ET1011 (also found online) as reference for some of the other registers, which although not exactly the same, is almost identical. You're welcome to a copy of that too.

Cheers,

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/