Re: [GIT PATCH] big staging merge for 3.2

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Oct 26 2011 - 17:07:06 EST


On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Here is the big staging merge for 3.2
> >
> > Note, I ended up merging this with your 3.1 release to resolve a merge
> > issue with one of the comedi drivers to fix a build issue.  If you want
> > me to redo the tree without this merge, I'll be glad to do so and let
> > you do it :)
>
> I don't hate merges that make sense, and that one looks fine. You
> picked a logical merge point, and you wrote a merge message that
> explains it. No problem.
>
> > There's a lot of patches in here, and the overall diff is quite
> > impressive:
> > 834 files changed, 103718 insertions(+), 230262 deletions(-)
>
> Hmm... I only get
>
> 725 files changed, 103936 insertions(+), 180480 deletions(-)
>
> Which is still good, but nothing like your numbers. Where did you find
> the extra 50k lines?

I don't know, I took it straight from git.

I did a:
git diff -M --stat --summary master..HEAD

And in that tree master was v3.1 and HEAD was 43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958
so if you do:
git diff -M --stat --summary v3.1..43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958

in your tree, I also get the above diffstat:

$ git diff -M --stat --summary v3.1..43a3beb6da994549ec28a9f31727b997a025f958 | grep insert
834 files changed, 103718 insertions(+), 230262 deletions(-)

Did I do that wrong? There are a lot of renames, is my default value
for git different than what you might have on your box? Or am I diffing
the wrong thing here?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/