Re: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't workas it should
From: Artem S. Tashkinov
Date: Mon Oct 31 2011 - 05:40:09 EST
> On Oct 31, 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > > Please make sure both are set to 0. If they were not 0 at the time you
> > > ran your tests, please retest and report back.
> > That's 0 & 0 for me.
> How idle is your system during the test?
load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
As I've mentioned great many times I run this test on a completely idle system
(i.e. I even `init 3` in advance to avoid any unexpected CPU usage spikes
caused by unrelated processed).
I have to insist that people conduct this test on their own without trusting my
words. Probably there's something I overlook or don't fully understand but from
what I see, there's a serious issue here (at least Microsoft XP and 7 work exactly
the way I believe an OS should handle such a load).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/