[PATCH 07/17] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw

[Tejun Heo]

There's no point in thawing nosig tasks before others.  There's no
ordering requirement between the two groups on thaw, which the staged
thawing can't guarantee anyway.  Simplify thaw_processes() by removing
the distinction and collapsing thaw_tasks() into thaw_processes().
This will help further updates to freezer.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/power/process.c |   20 +++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
index 23822dc..9db048f 100644
--- a/kernel/power/process.c
+++ b/kernel/power/process.c
@@ -170,34 +170,28 @@ int freeze_kernel_threads(void)
 	return error;
 }
 
-static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only)
+void thaw_processes(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *g, *p;
 
+	oom_killer_enable();
+
+	printk("Restarting tasks ... ");
+
+	thaw_workqueues();
+
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	do_each_thread(g, p) {
 		if (!freezable(p))
 			continue;
 
-		if (nosig_only && should_send_signal(p))
-			continue;
-
 		if (cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(p))
 			continue;
 
 		__thaw_task(p);
 	} while_each_thread(g, p);
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-}
-
-void thaw_processes(void)
-{
-	oom_killer_enable();
 
-	printk("Restarting tasks ... ");
-	thaw_workqueues();
-	thaw_tasks(true);
-	thaw_tasks(false);
 	schedule();
 	printk("done.\n");
 }
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/