Re: [Patch] tmpfs: add fallocate support

From: Cong Wang
Date: Wed Nov 16 2011 - 02:22:24 EST


ä 2011å11æ16æ 01:43, Dave Hansen åé:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 18:23 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
+static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
+ loff_t offset, loff_t len)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
+ struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+ struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
+ struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
+ pgoff_t start = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
+ pgoff_t end = DIV_ROUND_UP((offset + len), PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
+ pgoff_t index = start;
+ gfp_t gfp = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
+ loff_t i_size = i_size_read(inode);
+ struct page *page = NULL;
+ int ret;
+
+ if ((offset + len)<= i_size)
+ return 0;

This seems to say that if the fallocate() call ends before the end of
the file we should ignore the call. In other words, this can only be
used to extend the file, but could not be used to fill in the holes of a
sparse file.

Is there a reason it was done that way?

Hmm, I missed the case of sparse file, so you are right, I need to fix it.


+ if (!(mode& FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) {
+ ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }

inode_newsize_ok()'s comments say:

* inode_newsize_ok must be called with i_mutex held.

But I don't see any trace of it.


Hmm, even for tmpfs? I see none of the tmpfs code takes
i_mutex lock though...

+ if (start == end) {
+ if (!(mode& FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
+ i_size_write(inode, offset + len);
+ return 0;
+ }

There's a whitespace borkage like that 'mode&' all over this patch.
Probably needs a little love.

Odd, it is fine in my local patch, and it passed checkpatch.pl
check before I sent it.

<...>

This seems to have borrowed quite generously from shmem_getpage_gfp().
Seems like some code consolidation is in order before this level of
copy-n-paste.

Yes, I will separate the similar code.

Thanks for review!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/