[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix invalid backpanel values for GEN3 or older chips
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Wed Nov 16 2011 - 12:14:56 EST
While refactoring of backlight control code in commit [a95735569:
drm/i915: Refactor panel backlight controls], the handling of the bit
0 of duty-cycle was gone except for pineview. This resulted in invalid
register values for old chips like 915GM. When the bit 0 is set, the
backlight is turned off suddenly.
This patch changes the bit-0 check by replacing with the condition of
gen < 4 (pineview is included in this condition, too).
Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index 499d4c0..737d00f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -178,12 +178,10 @@ u32 intel_panel_get_max_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
max >>= 16;
} else {
- if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev)) {
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) {
max >>= 17;
} else {
max >>= 16;
- if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
- max &= ~1;
}
if (is_backlight_combination_mode(dev))
@@ -203,7 +201,7 @@ u32 intel_panel_get_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
val = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL) & BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK;
} else {
val = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL) & BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK;
- if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev))
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
val >>= 1;
if (is_backlight_combination_mode(dev)) {
@@ -246,7 +244,7 @@ static void intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(struct drm_device *dev, u32 level
}
tmp = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL);
- if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev)) {
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) {
tmp &= ~(BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK - 1);
level <<= 1;
} else
--
1.7.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/