Re: [patch] mpi/mpi-mpow: NULL dereference on allocation failure

[walter harms]

Am 21.11.2011 15:50, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We can't call mpi_free() on the elements if the first kzalloc() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c b/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> index 4cc7593..7328d0d 100644
> --- a/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> +++ b/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int mpi_mulpowm(MPI res, MPI *basearray, MPI *exparray, MPI m)
>  
>  	G = kzalloc((1 << k) * sizeof *G, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!G)
> -		goto nomem;
> +		goto err_out;
>  
>  	/* and calculate */
>  	tmp = mpi_alloc(mpi_get_nlimbs(m) + 1);
> @@ -129,5 +129,6 @@ nomem:
>  	for (i = 0; i < (1 << k); i++)
>  		mpi_free(G[i]);
>  	kfree(G);
> +err_out:
>  	return rc;
>  }

the patch is ok
but is there any reason *not* to use a more nice name that 'G'
something more descriptive perhaps ?

re,
 wh


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/