Re: [PATCH] btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval

[Chris Mason]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:24:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty
> limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the
> next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm.

Thanks Wu, were you planning on pushing this through your tree or should
I take it?

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/