Re: [patch] hugetlb: remove dummy definitions of HPAGE_MASK and HPAGE_SIZE
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon Nov 21 2011 - 19:37:52 EST
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:47 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> These symbols are on dead code paths, so they are eliminated by the
> compiler's Dead Code Elimination (DCE) optimizations, and the BUG() code
> never gets emitted to the final executable.
If you are so damn sure of that, then DON'T MAKE IT A BUG_ON! If you
are 100% syre, then you might as well leave out the BUG_ON() entirely.
Seriously. What's so hard to understand?
Either you are 100% sure, or you are not. If you are 100% sure, then
the BUG_ON() is pointless. And if you are not, then the BUG_ON() is
*wrong*.
Notice? The BUG_ON() is never *ever* valid. You cannot have it both
ways. So stop pushing crap, already!
So what are non-crap solutions?
- the current one: error out at compile time (early) if somebody uses
them in invalid contexts.
This seems to be a good case, especially since apparently no actual
current code wants to use them outside of the existing #ifdef's. And
there is no reason to think that some random MIPS-only future code is
a good enough reason to re-introduce these things
- if you really want to use them, but expect the compiler to always
compile them away as dead code, use a non-existing function linkage,
so that you at least get a static failure at link-time for incorrect
code, rather than some random BUG_ON() at run-time that may be
impossible to find.
See? There are real solutions. BUG_ON() is not one of them.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/