Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework

[Ohad Ben-Cohen]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:48:19 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Modern SoCs typically employ a central symmetric multiprocessing (SMP)
>> application processor running Linux, with several other asymmetric
>> multiprocessing (AMP) heterogeneous processors running different instances
>> of operating system, whether Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
>
> OK, I'm not even sure who this should go through

We shortly discussed this in ELCE, and this can either go through the
arm-soc tree or directly to Linus; however Arnd prefers really.

The previous RFC iteration was reviewed quite extensively (especially
by Grant. thanks Grant!) but I was hoping to get some more review or
feedback on this iteration as well (any form of Acked-by, Reviewed-by,
+1-by or No-way-by are welcome).

At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are
actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to
collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week
(minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you,
Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3.

>, but no objections here

Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ?

Thanks!
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/