Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

From: Cong Wang
Date: Mon Nov 28 2011 - 22:25:19 EST


ä 2011å11æ29æ 03:00, James Bottomley åé:

I'd vote for as a whole as well, but if there's some legitimate reason
why not, then take them through Jiri's trivial tree; it's pretty trivial
anyway and at least going that way would keep them bisectable.


Ok, I just made a branch which keeps these patches as a single one,

git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #kmap_atomic-single

As the single patch is 233K, so I don't send it to mailing list.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/