Re: iwlagn is getting very shaky
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tue Nov 29 2011 - 03:34:28 EST
I noticed that the logs are a bit odd wrt. timing.
> > Intersperesed I see some other messages that are new to me:
> > [ 4019.443129] Open BA session requested for 00:0a:79:eb:56:10 tid 0
> > [ 4019.500149] activated addBA response timer on tid 0
> > [ 4020.500033] addBA response timer expired on tid 0
I guess the delay here is due to the synchronize_net()? That can take a
while, 57ms seems a lot but I suppose it's possible.
> > [ 4020.501626] Tx BA session stop requested for 00:0a:79:eb:56:10 tid 0
> > [ 4023.740570] switched off addBA timer for tid 0
> > [ 4023.740578] got addBA resp for tid 0 but we already gave up
>
> Here is the AP is finally replying
It's kinda hard to believe that the AP took 4 seconds (!) to reply to
the frame. Where could the frame get stuck? I don't see any other work
processing happening etc. either. It's also curious that in those 3
seconds between these messages, we didn't actually get around to
stopping the session, that only happens just after:
> > [ 4023.740619] Stopping Tx BA session for 00:0a:79:eb:56:10 tid 0
(here)
> > [ 4023.768544] Open BA session requested for 00:0a:79:eb:56:10 tid 0
>
> Here we are trying again
>
> > [ 4023.784292] activated addBA response timer on tid 0
> > [ 4023.786294] switched off addBA timer for tid 0
20ms response time here, that's much more reasonable.
Could something be hogging the workqueues?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/