Re: [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support

[Ingo Molnar]

* Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> These patches were built and tested against 3.1. The older RFC 
> patches that have been lingering in tip/x86/xsave for the last 
> few months should be removed.

They have been lingering because of negative review feedback i 
have given to you about LWP. I'm not convinced about the current 
form of abstraction that this patch-set offers.

See this past discussion from half a year ago:

  Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/8] x86, xsave: rework of extended state handling, LWP support

We can and should do better than that.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/