Re: Not really merged? Re: [merged]x86-paravirt-pte-updates-in-kunmap_atomic-need-to-be-synchronous-regardless-of-lazy_mmu-mode.patchremoved from -mm tree

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:02:49 +0100 Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So, as of today, this seems to be back on the master branch of linux-next (I
> > guess from Andrew putting it back, but I am never sure with linux-next). But I
> > am not sure how/when this would go into Linus tree. I assume without any
> > specific action maybe merge window for 3.3...
> > We got some positive feedback on it from users running into the problem. So it
> > seems like a valuable change. From the discusions so far I take that technically
> > the change did not trigger resistance. For that reason I wanted to ask whether
> > there is a chance that this looks important enough to be pushed before the next
> > merge window...
> 
> I sent this patch to the x86 maintainers two weeks ago.  It 
> was ignored, as were the other 11 patches I sent.  Later I 
> will resend them all.  If they are again ignored I will later 
> send them yet again, and so on.

they are still sitting in my mbox - working down the backlog 
now.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/