Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Codecleanup

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:01:39PM -0200, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0000, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> >>This patch removes commented code, useless comments, blank lines and fix
> >>coding style of the headers of functions.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
> >>Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>---
> >> /*
> >>- * Description: Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>- *
> >>- * Parameters:
> >>- *  In:
> >>- *      dwIoBase        - I/O base address
> >>- *      byContntOffset  - address of EEPROM
> >>- *      byTestBits      - bits to test
> >>- *  Out:
> >>- *      none
> >>- *
> >>- * Return Value: true if all test bits off; otherwise false
> >>- *
> >>+ * Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>  */
> >
> >Some of these seems sort of useful.  It might be better to change
> >them to doc-book format instead of deleting them:
> >
> >/**
> >* SROMbIsRegBitsOff() - Test if bits off in eeprom
> >* @dwIoBase:       I/O base address
> >* @byContntOffset: Address of EEPROM
> >* @byTestBits:     Bits to test
> >*
> >* Returns true if all test bits off; otherwise false.
> >*/
> >
> >There is a howto in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion Dan. I will do it for these 3 patches.
> 
> Greg, please delte this patches, I will sent them again.

Ugh, "which" patches are you referring to?

I see lots here from you, with different back-and-forth from Dan, and I
don't really see an easy way to tell which thread from which, given that
you didn't thread the patches using git-send-email.

So, I've dropped all patches from you from my patch queue, can you
please resend the ones that I am supposed to apply that have been
reviewed by Dan as being acceptable?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/