Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: add device tree support for max8997
From: Thomas Abraham
Date: Fri Dec 09 2011 - 02:25:34 EST
On 9 December 2011 11:47, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:57:39PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
>> +Required properties, if interrupts are delivered to host system:
>
> These are just optional properties, really.
Ok. Yeah, these can be classified as optional.
>
>> +- interrupt-parent: Specifies the phandle of the interrupt controller to which
>> + the interrupts from max8997 are delivered to.
>> +- interrupts: Interrupt specifiers for two interrupt sources.
>> + - First interrupt specifier is for 'irq1' interrupt.
>> + - Second interrupt specifier is for 'alert' interrupt.
>
> What if the two are connected to different interrupt controllers?
I have not thought of that. I will try to find out how to write a
device tree node for a device that delivers interrupts to separate
interrupt controllers.
Thanks,
Thomas.
>
>> + For LDO's:
>
> Extra '.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/