Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.

[Glauber Costa]

On 12/08/2011 11:24 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Dec 2011 19:34:56 -0200
> Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
> > This patch replaces all uses of struct sock fields' memory_pressure,
> > memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem to acessor
> > macros. Those macros can either receive a socket argument, or a mem_cgroup
> > argument, depending on the context they live in.
> >
> > Since we're only doing a macro wrapping here, no performance impact at all is
> > expected in the case where we don't have cgroups disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: David S. Miller<davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> please get ack from network guys.
> from me.
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ok.

I think that now with all the Reviewed-by:'s I will resend it as a 
Request for Inclusion for Dave (plus fixing the problem you noted in 
patch 1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/