Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul

[Ingo Molnar]

* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > In theory a kvm driven serial console should be extremely 
> > fast, much faster than a real serial console, basically as 
> > fast as a local console. Yet this still does not seem to be 
> > the case.
> > 
> > In fact even ssh-ing in to a box over Wifi and running the 
> > above top session is undistinguishable from top running in a 
> > local console. So IMO it cannot be virtualization overhead - 
> > there must still be some delay or serious lack of buffering 
> > somewhere.
> 
> Well, the difference between ssh and serial is, that ssh can 
> pack 1.5k worth of data into one frame, while serial has to 
> send it piecewise. And the emulation has to trap into kvm tool 
> for each tx byte, which doesnt help either. We cannot do much 
> with buffering on the kvm tool side as we have no clue how 
> much consecutive data will come in. That's why there is a 
> virtual console, which has the disadvantage that you cant see 
> the early boot messages.

Okay, but look at it from another angle: the top output i 
generate is about 300k characters. 5000 msecs to execute it 
means 16 usecs overhead per character - or about 50k cycles - on 
a top of the class x86 CPU.

50k cycles for every single byte. And as a user i notice that 
first hand.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/