Re: slub: Lockout validation scans during freeing of object

[Pekka Enberg]

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> Eric tested this one.
>
>
> Subject: slub: Lockout validation scans during freeing of object
>
> Slab validation can run right now while the slab free paths prepare
> the redzone fields etc around the objects in preparation of the
> actual freeing of the object. This can lead to false positives.
>
> Take the node lock unconditionally during free so that the validation
> can examine objects without them being disturbed by freeing operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> mm/slub.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c	2011-11-22 10:42:19.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c	2011-11-22 10:44:34.000000000 -0600
> @@ -2391,8 +2391,15 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cach
>
> 	stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
>
> -	if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && !free_debug_processing(s, page, x, addr))
> -		return;
> +	if (kmem_cache_debug(s)) {
> +
> +		/* Lock out any concurrent validate_slab calls */
> +		n = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> +
> +		if (!free_debug_processing(s, page, x, addr))
> +			goto out;
> +	}
>
> 	do {
> 		prior = page->freelist;
> @@ -2471,6 +2478,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cach
> 			stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
> 		}
> 	}
> +out:
> 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> 	return;

Ditto.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/