Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul

[Sasha Levin]

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 10:27 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Well, the difference between ssh and serial is, that ssh can pack 1.5k
> > worth of data into one frame, while serial has to send it
> > piecewise. And the emulation has to trap into kvm tool for each tx
> > byte, which doesnt help either. We cannot do much with buffering on
> > the kvm tool side as we have no clue how much consecutive data will
> > come in. That's why there is a virtual console, which has the
> > disadvantage that you cant see the early boot messages.
> 
> You can emulate a chip with a 64byte or so FIFO. You can do I/O cycle
> prediction in the kernel part and you can use the empty bit as a clue
> (which is what most serial<->ethernet widgetry does).

The performance problems here aren't the same performance problems you
have on real hardware. The problem here is that it costs 40k cycles for
the guest to access the emulated chip.

-- 

Sasha.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/