Re: [PATCH 3/4] EFI: Add support for variables longer than 1024bytes
From: Matthew Garrett
Date: Wed Dec 14 2011 - 17:57:37 EST
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:44:34PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 02:39 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> What are your thoughts on _not_ wrapping efi_variable with
> >> extended_efi_variable, and instead just using a
> >> "internal_efi_variable" structure that we copy stuff into/outof. I
> >> think that would make the memory management for dealing with the
> >> different sizes a lot easier to follow.
> >
> > Hm. I think that'd only work if we expose a new interface. Writes would
> > be easy enough to handle, but reads still need to work for old apps.
> >
>
> Would making the old ABI readonly and add a new write interface resolve
> the problem with compat mode?
Yes, but we'd break existing userspace.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/