Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix refill related races

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wed Dec 14 2011 - 18:51:12 EST


On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:54:06 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:25:07AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Orthogonally, the refill-stop code is still buggy, as you noted.
>
> Sorry I don't understand how it's still buggy.

Both places where we call:

cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);

Do not actually guarantee that vi->refill isn't running, because it
can requeue itself. A 'bool no_more_refill' field seems like the
simplest fix for this, but I don't think it's sufficient.

Tejun, is this correct? What's the correct way to synchronously stop a
delayed_work which can "schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);" on
itself?

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/